1. Home
  2. News & Issues
  3. Crime / Punishment
photo of Charles Montaldo

Charles' Crime / Punishment Blog

By Charles Montaldo, About.com Guide to Crime / Punishment since 2004

New Phil Spector Jury Hears Opening Statements

Thursday October 30, 2008
Prosecutors opened the second Phil Spector murder trial much like they opened the first one, describing the death of actress Lana Clarkson in the foyer of Spector's mansion in 2003 and painting the famed music producer as an eccentric who repeatedly threatened women and pointed guns at them.

Prosecutor Alan Jackson told jurors that Spector could become "very sinister, very violent and very deadly" when he was drunk.

During his opening statement, Jackson showed the jury photographs of five women from Spector's past who have testified previously about being threatened by him. He also showed the jury a video of the previous testimony of one witness who died since her previous testimony.

Defense attorney Doron Weinberg attacked the prosecution's statement as an attack on Spector's character rather than trying the case based on the facts.

No Evidence of Firing the Gun

"This is turning into the trial of his character, which this court knows is clearly unconstitutional and impermissible," Weinberg told Superior Court Judge Larry Fidler.

Weinberg moved for a mistrial, but his motion was denied by Judge Fidler.

During his opening, Weinberg told the jury that forensic analysis of blood spatter and gunshot residue would prove that Spector did not fire the gun that killed Clarkson. As in the first trial, the defense said Clarkson was despondent over her fading career and committed suicide.

Last year, a mistrial was declared in Spector's first trial for second-degree murder when jurors deadlocked.

See Also:
New Jury Hears Arguments in Spector Retrial

Background:
The Murder of Lana Clarkson
The Phil Spector Case

Forum:
Discuss The Phil Spector Case

Free Newsletter:
Get the Crime & Punishment Newsletter

Photo: Jamie Rector / Getty Images

Comments

October 30, 2008 at 9:54 pm
(1) Sam says:

Why is the second Phil Spector trial not being televised? Is it because he does not want the TV cameras on him or something else. I watched the first one and could not belive the ending. Could it be because the crime was in LA.

October 31, 2008 at 3:01 pm
(2) flowerchild4 says:

Yea, why isn’t it being televised, and why isn’t there much national coverage?

October 31, 2008 at 3:03 pm
(3) flowerchild4 says:

WHY isn’t it being televised and why isn’t there more national coverage. The only information I’m able to get is from the LA Times…

November 11, 2008 at 2:31 pm
(4) Sandy says:

or is it cuz the defendants “usually” lose a retrial?

Leave a Comment

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>

Explore Crime / Punishment

About.com Special Features

What is a Recession?

Sure, we're all talking about it, but what, exactly, defines a recession? More >

Weird Breaking News

A daily look at some of the oddest (and dumbest) crimes around. More >

  1. Home
  2. News & Issues
  3. Crime / Punishment

©2009 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company.

All rights reserved.